HERMENEUTIC REALIZATION OF GENDER IN LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION
PDF

Keywords

gender linguistics, discourse, text, femininity, masculinity, communication, language studies, gendered speech

How to Cite

Shahnoza Shuxrat qizi, S. (2025). HERMENEUTIC REALIZATION OF GENDER IN LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION. Advances in Science and Education, 1(7), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.70728/edu.v01.i07.011

Abstract

The study explores the gender features in linguistics as an emerging interdisciplinary field that connects
language studies with sociology and psychology. It examines the linguistic expressions of femininity and
masculinity, highlighting how gender is reflected in speech behavior and discourse. The research emphasizes
that both spoken and written texts can serve as valuable materials for analyzing gendered communication.
The paper also discusses the relationship between discourse and text, arguing that discourse encompasses
broader communicative and cognitive processes, while text represents one of its manifestations. By focusing
on the interaction between language, gender, and discourse, the study provides insights into how male and
female speech differs in structure, content, and stylistic choice.

PDF

References

1. Cameron, D. (1998). The Feminist Critique of

Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.

2. Coates, J. (2004). Women, Men and Language:

A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences

in Language. London: Pearson Education.

3. Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to

Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.

4. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place.

New York: Harper Row.

5. Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand:

Women and Men in Conversation. New York:

Ballantine Books.

6. Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An

Introduction to Language and Society. London:

Penguin.

7. Talbot, M. (2010). Language and Gender.

Cambridge: Polity Press.

8. Eckert, P., McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013).

Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

9. Wardhaugh, R. (2015). An Introduction to

Sociolinguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.

10. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and

the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

11. Mills, S. (2008). Language and Sexism.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12. Fishman, P. (1983). Interaction: The Work

Women Do. Social Problems, 25(4), 397–406.

13. Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered Discourses.

London: Palgrave Macmillan.

14. Spender, D. (1980). Man Made Language.

London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

15. Hellinger, M., Bussmann, H. (2001).

Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic

Representation of Women and Men.

Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

16. Holmes, J., Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.) (2003). The

Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:

Blackwell.

17. Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and Discourse.

London: Sage Publications.

18. Sh.Safarov. (2019). Til va nutqning kognitiv

tahlili. Toshkent: Fan.

19. Xudoyberganova, M. (2020). Gender va

tilshunoslik masalalari. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston

Milliy Universiteti nashriyoti.

20. Kadyrova, N. (2021). Discourse and Gender in

Uzbek Linguistics. Tashkent: KSU Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.