SIMULATION-BASED METHODOLOGY FOR IMPROVING CHEMISTRY TEACHING DESIGN MODELS
PDF

Keywords

chemistry education, imitation model, model-based learning, simulation-based instruction, UV-Vis analysis.

How to Cite

Davronova, F. (2026). SIMULATION-BASED METHODOLOGY FOR IMPROVING CHEMISTRY TEACHING DESIGN MODELS. Advances in Science and Education, 2(05), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.70728/edu.v02.i05.001

Abstract

This study proposes a simulation-based approach to enhance the design of chemistry teaching by integrating imitation models and computer-based analytical tools. Contemporary chemistry education is often challenged by the problem of relating abstract theoretical constructs to observable phenomena in experiments, resulting in poor conceptual understanding of the subject by learners. The aim of this research is to design and implement an instructional model that integrates UV-Vis spectral analysis, computer simulation, and guided analysis to enhance conceptual learning and scientific reasoning. The study used a design-based approach to education using simulation software and learning tasks. The students engaged in spectrum analysis, parameter variation, and model adjustment tasks using computer simulation software. The findings show that simulation-enhanced instruction led to a significant improvement in students’ capacity to interpret spectral information, understand variable relationships, and apply modeling concepts in chemistry learning. Rubric analysis showed improved performance in model interpretation and data analysis skills compared to conventional learning methods. The study concludes that simulation models based on imitation provide an efficient pedagogical tool for designing modern chemistry education for conceptual understanding, analytical reasoning, and model learning skills.

PDF

References

1.Bolger, M. S., et al. (2021). Supporting scientific practice through model-based inquiry. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(3), ar41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0128

2.Chan, P., & Fok, W. (2021). Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.

3.Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-based teaching in science education. Science Education, 100(6), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21254

4.Ibnu, S., et al. (2020). Inquiry-based learning to improve higher-order thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1035

5.Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2015). The role of modelling in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP90009H

6.Lu, D., et al. (2024). Virtual simulation systems in chemistry teaching. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010012

7.Ortega, A. P., et al. (2024). Use of virtual simulations in chemistry teaching. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2357

8.Orosz, G., et al. (2023). Guided inquiry in secondary-school chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00110A

9.Rusmansyah, R., et al. (2019). Innovative chemistry learning model and critical thinking. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.555

10.Samad, N. A., Osman, K., & Nayan, N. A. (2023). Computational thinking in chemistry education. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(4), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.4.771

11.Tekin-Dede, A., & Bukova-Güzel, E. (2018). Rubric development for modeling assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1887–1901. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85734

12.Valeeva, R., et al. (2023). Impact of modeling in science education: A systematic review. European Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13268

13.Farag, M. A., et al. (2022). UV fingerprinting for quality control. Foods, 11(18), 2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182867

14.Arnold, J. C., et al. (2018). Competency assessment in inquiry-based education. Education Sciences, 8(4), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040184

15.Chan, K. K., et al. (2019). Enhancing modeling competence in chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1341–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1597221

16.Carroll, G. (2024). Towards expansive model-based teaching: A systematic review of model-based instructional strategies in empirical research over the past decade. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2417157

17.Dass, K. (2015). Building an understanding of how model-based inquiry is implemented in professional development for high school chemistry teachers. Journal of Chemical Education

18.Demirçalı, S., & Selvi, M. (2022). Effects of model-based science education on students’ academic achievement and scientific process skills. 10.36681/tused.2022.136

19.Jegstad, K. M., et al. (2024). Inquiry-based chemistry education: A systematic review. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2248436

20.Margolin, J., et al. (2022). Modeling in science education: A synthesis of recent research. American Institutes for Research (AIR) report.

21.Yeni, S., et al. (2024). Computational thinking integrated in school subjects: Impacts and implementation considerations. [ScienceDirect journal article] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100696

22.Hung, C. S., et al. (2024). High school science teachers’ assessment literacy for inquiry-based science instruction. International Journal of Science Education https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2251657

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.