AKADEMIK YOZUV SAMARADORLIGI: TAJRIBA VA TAHLIL
PDF

Keywords

akademik yozuv, samaradorlik, epistemik e’tiqod, motivatsiya, yozuv strategiyalari, tanqidiy fikrlash, mixed methods

How to Cite

I.Xudaynazarov, I. (2025). AKADEMIK YOZUV SAMARADORLIGI: TAJRIBA VA TAHLIL. Advances in Science and Education, 1(09), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.70728/edu.v01.i09.011

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada akademik yozuv samaradorligini aniqlashda epistemik e’tiqodlar, motivatsiya va yozuv strategiyalarining o‘zaro ta’siri aralash metod (mixed methods) asosida tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqot doirasida ingliz tili yo‘nalishidagi talabalarning yozma ishlarini statistik (Pearson korrelyatsiyasi) va tematik (NVivo) tahlil qilish orqali bilimga munosabat, yozuvdagi tanqidiy fikrlash hamda o‘zini ifodalash kompetensiyasining shakllanish jarayoni o‘rganildi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, akademik yozuv samaradorligi talabalarning kognitiv faolligi, motivatsion yo‘nalishi va madaniy kompetensiyasi bilan uzviy bog‘liqdir. Maqola natijalari O‘zbekiston oliy ta’lim tizimida akademik yozuv fanini o‘qitish va baholashda amaliy ahamiyatga ega.

PDF

References

1. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

2. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.

4. Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and Researching Writing (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

5. Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a Self-Regulated Writer: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73–101.

6. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of Beliefs about the Nature of Knowledge on Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.

7. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

8. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

9. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.

10. Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.

11. Begmatov, E. (2020). Akademik yozuv asoslari. Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya nashriyoti.

12. Mahmudov, N. (2019). Til va tafakkur uyg‘unligi masalalari. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti nashriyoti.

13. Yo‘ldoshev, A. (2018). Talabalarda yozma nutqni rivojlantirishning metodik asoslari. Oliy ta’lim muammolari jurnali, 2(3), 44–52.

14. To‘xtaboyev, B. (2021). Raqamli yozuv kompetensiyasini shakllantirish masalalari. Til va ta’lim, 5(1), 63–70.

15. Xudaynazarov, I. I. (2022). Akademik yozuvda tahliliy fikrlashni shakllantirish omillari. Filologiya masalalari ilmiy jurnali, 3(2), 118–125.

16. Mamatqulova, M. (2020). Akademik yozuvni o‘rgatishda lingvokulturologik yondashuv. Filologiya va tillarni o‘qitish, 7(3), 55–62.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.